Improving the Oral Health of Older People in Care Homes
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Improving the oral healTh of Older People In Care homes: a feasibility study (TOPIC)
IRAS ID
254421
Contact name
Georgios Tsakos
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
University College London
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Z6364106/2019/03/42, UCL Data Protection number
Duration of Study in the UK
2 years, 5 months, 31 days
Research summary
Currently, half of all care home residents have their own natural teeth and this proportion is likely to increase. Preventing dental disease for care homes residents is important for their function and quality of life. It also reduces the need to provide treatment in care homes, which is often difficult and costly.
A national survey found that current prevention practices and services in care homes are poor. There is also limited information about how best to prevent oral disease among residents.
A recent NICE guideline aims to maintain and improve oral health of care home residents. This study aims to assess the feasibility of an intervention to improve the oral health of older people (aged sixty-five years or older) in care homes, based on the NICE guideline.
Care homes will be randomly divided into two groups: intervention and control. The intervention consists of:
• an oral health assessment of residents
• daily “support worker assisted” tooth brushing with 1,500 fluoride toothpaste
• a staff training package on how to improve oral healthThree work streams (WS) are proposed. WS1 will assess the feasibility of undertaking the intervention. Eligible residents who have their own natural teeth will be recruited. Baseline assessments will be conducted, using trained dentists to collect clinical information. Questionnaires will be used to collect other data (e.g. sociodemographic, quality of life). Recruitment, retention and the acceptability of the intervention for residents, staff and managers will be determined. After twelve months, the assessments will be repeated and findings will be compared to those at baseline.
The WS2 will interview residents, managers and staff to understand the proposed intervention’s acceptability.
The WS3 will explore issues relating to an economic evaluation that presents costs and different outcomes in order to help decision-making. It will identify the outcomes considered important to different stakeholders and determine the possibility of reducing these to a core set of indicators.
REC name
London - City & East Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
19/LO/1107
Date of REC Opinion
26 Jul 2019
REC opinion
Favourable Opinion