Hill of vision in glaucoma

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Developing a method to describe the ‘hill of vision’ in glaucoma

  • IRAS ID

    224357

  • Contact name

    David F Garway-Heath

  • Contact email

    David.Garway-Heath@moorfields.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 11 months, 15 days

  • Research summary

    Visual field(VF) test is one of the most important examinations in the management of glaucoma patients. Its purposes are to aid clinicians to make a diagnosis, assess how glaucoma evolves, and determine how the patient can see. However, information obtained using conventional VF test is not fully sufficient to fulfill these purposes. The field of vision is commonly represented as a hill, with the most sensitive part being the peak or point of fixation, which corresponds to the fovea in the retina.
    To map the VF of a patient, which allows the clinician to detect areas of poor vision, visual field is measured at different locations, which are stimulated by various light intensities. However, with the current techniques, the number of locations tested is very limited, which makes it difficult to assess the evolution of the disease with accuracy or to understand patient vision-related quality of life(QoL). Increasing the number of test locations would require longer test duration, which could cause patients tiredness thus reducing the reliability of the examination.
    To address this issue, we are developing a new method for predicting sensitivities between the tested locations using conventional VF test without having to increase the number of test locations.
    The aim of this study to investigate the agreement of predicted value with the measured sensitivity from a full threshold VF test in glaucoma patients and to compare with the other methods previously reported.

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/EM/0243

  • Date of REC Opinion

    14 Jul 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion