High Intensity Interval Training within Cardiac Rehabilitation

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A Randomised Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of High-Intensity Interval Training Compared with Moderate-Intensity Interval Training for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation

  • IRAS ID

    176999

  • Contact name

    Adrian Midgley

  • Contact email

    adrian.midgley@edgehill.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT02376244

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 4 months, 28 days

  • Research summary

    Phase III cardiac rehabilitation programmes within the UK primarily involve cardiac patients performing bouts of physical exercise twice per week for 8 weeks. The exercise bouts are typically characterised by repeated short periods of exercise interspersed with short periods of rest. This type of physical exercise is known as interval training.

    The proposed study will investigate whether greater rehabilitation improvements can be achieved if patients engage in higher intensity interval training compared to the moderate intensity interval training performed during standard care. Outcome variables will be changes in physical fitness and quality of life over the period of the 8-week rehabilitation programme, and psychological perceptions (such as enjoyment) of the two exercise intensities. The study aims to overcome limitations from the use of heart rate for prescribing the exercise by prescribing exercise using perceived exertion. Perceived exertion is measured on a scale ranging between 6-20 and is defined as how much effort patients perceive they are investing in the exercise. The intervention will involve patients exercising at a perceived exertion of between 16-17. The patients receiving standard care will exercise at a perceived exertion of 11-13.

  • REC name

    North West - Greater Manchester East Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/NW/0281

  • Date of REC Opinion

    24 Apr 2015

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion