GALILEO
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Global multicenter, open-label, randomized, event-driven, active-controlled study comparing a rivAroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy to an antipLatelet-based strategy after transcatheter aortIc vaLve rEplacement (TAVR) to Optimize clinical outcomes.
IRAS ID
190428
Contact name
David Hildick-Smith
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Bayer HealthCare AG
Eudract number
2015-001975-30
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Duration of Study in the UK
2 years, 5 months, 30 days
Research summary
This is global multicenter, open-label, randomized, event-driven, active-controlled study comparing a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy to an antiplatelet-based strategy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to Optimize clinical outcomes.
Patients after valve replacement procedure are at risk of blood clot formation. This blood clot can reduce the blood flow in arteries cutting off the supply of oxygen to the cells. Blood components such as thrombin and platelets play an important role in the formation of a blood plug or clot. In order to prevent this, it is recommended to use oral antiplatelet drugs, such as aspirin and clopidogrel before and after the valve replacement procedure. These medications can reduce the risk of clot formation. However, current data suggest that antiplatelet based therapy alone with aspirin and clopidogrel may not be optimal treatment for patients after TAVR procedure.The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether rivaroxaban is effective and safe in preventing clot formation in the blood in patients after TAVR procedure.
Rivaraxoban is already a marketed product in other conditions such as prevention of blood clots after major hip or knee surgery and others. However, the aim of this study is evaluate rivaroxaban for clot prevention in patients after TAVR procedure.In this study patients will be randomized to receive either rivaroxaban based therapy or standard anti platelet therapy. Patients will remain in the study until predefined number of efficacy endpoints is collected. It is expected this will be reached in around 720 days after first patient is recruited in the study. For individual patients it is expected to have average follow up duration of 18 Months with the range between 12 to 24 Months. Post-treatment follow up will be 30 days for all patients.
REC name
East Midlands - Derby Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
16/EM/0007
Date of REC Opinion
26 Feb 2016
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion