Functional Outcomes in Patients undergoing GI operations

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery

  • IRAS ID

    228138

  • Contact name

    George Ramsay

  • Contact email

    george.ramsay@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Aberdeen and NHS Grampian

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 6 days

  • Research summary

    Rationale

    Alterations in functional status has been detected following vascular surgery and critical care admissions but data is lacking on these outcomes in general surgical patients.

    Objectives

    Our aims are two fold. Firstly we will establish a mechanism for, and evaluate the feasibility of, assessing functional outcomes in patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer, and emergency abdominal surgery, as part of everyday clinical practice. Secondly we seek to determine whether elective surgery for colorectal cancer and emergency abdominal surgery are associated with changes in patients’ functional status and quality of life

    Methods

    This will be a single centre feasibility study targeting patients undergoing either elective colorectal cancer resection or emergency abdominal surgery. Functional status will be measured at baseline in the pre-operative period. Follow up measurement will be undertaken at one, six and twelve months post-operatively. Functional status will be measured using two separate tools, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) scale and the EQ-5D.

    Expected Outcomes

    Our main outcome will be the determination of whether it is feasible to assess functional outcomes in these patient groups or not. Results here will form the basis of a larger study to assess functional outcome following general surgical procedures. In addition we hope to be able to measure whether functional status changes in these patients following surgery and whether the effect is more marked in particular sub-populations.

  • REC name

    London - Camden & Kings Cross Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/LO/1291

  • Date of REC Opinion

    22 Aug 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion