Functional Outcome following Ivor-Lewis Oesophagectomy
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Functional Outcome following Ivor-Lewis Oesophagectomy
IRAS ID
240683
Contact name
Kumaresan Supramaniam
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 11 months, 31 days
Research summary
Oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer is the fifth most common malignancy in the United Kingdom, affecting approximately 16,000 people each year. Although surgery offers the best prospect for potential cure of OG cancers, radical treatment may result in increased treatment relate mortality, high treatment-induced morbidity, and reduced quality of life. Traditionally, many centres managing OG cancers focused on mortality and morbidity as their key outcome measures. However, a growing body of opinion considers that a measure of broader effects of ill health and treatment on the patients quality of life (QOL) is necessary. Such considerations are important as it is questionable if patients are subjected to treatment merely to offer them a few extra months of life, particularly if this is at the expense of quality of life. These includes physical, functional, social and physiological aspects of life.
More than half of the operated patients will develop significant functional disorder after surgery affecting QOL. The most common problems observed are dysphagia, dumping syndrome, delayed gastric emptying, and reflux. These functional disorder are not always detected immediately post operatively, but may become more troublesome as time goes by.
The purpose of this study is
-to evaluate mid to long term HRQL in patients that underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) with gastric pull-up in Royal Leicester Infirmary with minimum of 12 months follow up.
-to identify clinical factors influencing quality of life post operatively.
-explore patients’ experiences of their quality of life and how they handle their new life situation from a long-term perspective after oesophagectomy
The outcome of this study would benefit both surgeons and patients in terms of pre-operative counselling and planning.REC name
East Midlands - Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
18/EM/0301
Date of REC Opinion
9 Oct 2018
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion