FINESSE

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    An open, 3-cohort, phase II trial testing oral administration of lucitanib in patients with FGFR1-amplified or non-amplified estrogen receptor positive metastatic breast cancer.

  • IRAS ID

    134041

  • Contact name

    Helen Whitrow

  • Contact email

    helen.whitrow@uk.netgrs.com

  • Sponsor organisation

    Servier Research and Development Ltd

  • Eudract number

    2013-000288-10

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 5 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    This is an early phase study looking at the efficacy and safety of an oral drug, Lucitanib, an inhibitor of FGFR1, in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients will be tested for FGFR1 amplification and 11q gene amplification prior to stratification, however both amplified and non-amplified patients are eligible for this study.

    Response will be assessed by the following parameters
    1. Objective response rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients for whom a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) is observed during the treatment period (confirmed by RECIST criteria).
    2. Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) defined as the proportion of patients for whom a confirmed CR, PR or prolonged stable disease (SD) during treatment for at least 24 weeks from inclusion.
    3. Progression Free Survival (PFS)
    4. Response duration

    Safety and pharmacokinetics of lucitanib will also be evaluated.

    There are three patient cohorts in this study – (i) FGFR1-amplified, (ii) FGFR1-non amplified with 11q-ampliciation and (iii) FGFR1-non-amplified without 11q-amplification).

    The study is designed in two stages. Initially (stage 1), 21 patients will be enrolled in each cohort. If at least 2 patients in a given cohort showed evidence of response (as defined above) then a further 20 patients will be enrolled in this cohort (stage 2).

  • REC name

    London - Chelsea Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/LO/1417

  • Date of REC Opinion

    24 Oct 2013

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion