Experiences of social interaction and communication after a CST group

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    How do people with dementia and their carers experience social interaction and communication after attending a Cognitive Stimulation Therapy group?

  • IRAS ID

    201654

  • Contact name

    Amy Murphy

  • Contact email

    amy.murphy@hmc.ox.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 1 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    This study is interested in exploring how people with dementia and their carers experience social interaction and communication after attending a cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) group.

    CST is a 14 session group based intervention for people diagnosed with early stages of dementia. National guidelines recommend CST as a non- drug form of treatment that is suitable for all types of dementia. Research has shown that CST can lead to improvements in language abilities and other areas of cognition (memory and attention) as well as improved quality of life, including social interaction and relationships with others. To date, most of the research on CST has focussed on measuring changes in these areas and little research has explored the direct day to day experiences of people with dementia after attending the group. This study will therefore aim to interview people with dementia who have attended a CST group and their main carer, to explore how they experience social interaction and communication after attending the group.

    The study will include people in the mild to moderate stages of dementia who have attended a CST group in Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust. A semi-structured interview schedule will be used and three interviews will take place in total. The person with dementia and their carer will each take part in a short individual interview and then they will be interviewed jointly together about their experiences. Data will be analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis.

  • REC name

    North West - Haydock Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/NW/0615

  • Date of REC Opinion

    11 Aug 2016

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion