Exaluren in Alport syndrome participants with nonsense mutation in COL4A3/4/5 genes
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Delayed-Start Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Exaluren in Alport Syndrome Patients with Nonsense Mutations in COL4A3/4/5 Genes
IRAS ID
1013235
Contact name
Christopher Novashinski
Sponsor organisation
Eloxx Pharmaceuticals Inc
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Research summary
The Sponsor, Eloxx Pharmaceuticals Inc. is running a study to learn how well the study medication, exaluren, works and how safe it is for nonsense mutation Alport Syndrome participants. Alport syndrome (AS) is a rare, progressive hereditary kidney disorder affecting ~1:6500 people and characterised by progressive kidney damage, hearing loss, and eye abnormalities. Nonsense Mutation Alport Syndrome (NMAS) is a clinically severe ultra-rare subset, representing approximately 6–8% of all AS cases. NMAS is caused by a specific type of gene change (called a nonsense mutation) that is associated with most rapidly decreasing kidney function with half of UK patients with NMAS needing dialysis or a transplant before the age of 21 years.
This study intends to enrol up to 24 participants with NMAS in the US and UK. Participants in this study will be expected to participate for up to 42 weeks involving the screening period, treatment period and follow up period and will need to come to the study centre 11 times over this period. There are 2 parts to the study. In part 1, participants will be assigned to either an Exaluren Study Arm or Placebo Study Arm, where they will receive a daily administration of exaluren or placebo for 16 weeks. They will then continue to Part 2 of the treatment period in which they will be administered with exaluren for 16 weeks, no matter which treatment they received on Part 1. Participants will have procedures such as, blood tests, ECGs, vital sign measurements, urinalysis, audiometric assessments and a kidney biopsies. The participants will be monitored closely, as the treatment may have side effects that are not yet known.REC name
East of England - Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
25/EE/0239
Date of REC Opinion
12 Jan 2026
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion