Evaluation of the BHX Implant in Children with a BAHS

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Evaluation of implant stability and audiological benefit of Oticon Medical BHX implant in children undergoing surgery for a percutaneous bone anchored hearing system (BAHS)

  • IRAS ID

    239239

  • Contact name

    Aniravan Banerjee

  • Contact email

    anirvan.banerjee@stees.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Oticon Medical AB

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    3 years, 2 months, 15 days

  • Research summary

    C52 Study: Evaluation of the BHX Implant in Children with a BAHS

    Bone anchored hearing system (BAHS) are used for hearing rehabilitation for various hearing problems such as conductive hearing losses, mixed hearing losses and single sided deafness in the UK both in adults and children. A BAHS consist of a titanium implant fixed to the mastoid bone in the skull, a skin-penetrating abutment and a sound processor attached to the abutment. The sound processor receives the sound and converts the sound into vibrations that are transmitted through the the implant system to the skull thus reaching the cochlea to restore hearing.

    This trial involves the Ponto BHX implant, a CE marked product launched in market in 2015.The Ponto BHX implant is used world-wide for BAHS surgery in adults and in children. However, there is a lack of data collected in a proactive manner over long term in a clinical setting after the BHX implant has been used in children. Such data is of importance to monitor the product in a clinical setting and for further innovation and treatment improvement. The aim is to collect this data by following pediatric patients in a clinical setting treated following clinical praxis at the James Cook University Hospital.

    Pediatric patients (5-16 years) whose parents/guardians have already decided to go through a BAHS surgery will be invited to participate. These patients will be followed in the clinical setting for 24 months after surgery without making any significant changes to the hospitals pre-existing patient surgery and follow-up procedures. The study sponsor's have only added an extra visit which will facilitate close monitoring of the patient's progress.

  • REC name

    North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    18/NE/0149

  • Date of REC Opinion

    22 May 2018

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion