Evaluation of the AICE App and Embedded PREM for CCE Version 1.0

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Evaluation of the AICE App and Psychometric Validation of an Embedded PREM for Capsule Colon Endoscopy (CCE): A Mixed‑Methods Study

  • IRAS ID

    365428

  • Contact name

    Roma Maguire

  • Contact email

    roma.maguire@strath.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Strathclyde

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 5 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    BACKGROUND:
    Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, and early detection through screening significantly improves survival rates. Optical colonoscopy, the traditional screening method, is effective but invasive, uncomfortable, and carries risks of complications. Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) is a newer, less invasive alternative that allows screening in more comfortable settings, such as at home or primary care. However, CCE faces challenges, including incomplete procedures due to poor bowel preparation. These challenges can reduce the effectiveness of CCE and impact the patient experience.
    Digital health tools can help patients feel more confident and prepared during medical tests. By giving clear instructions, reminders, and useful information at the right time, these tools can make the process easier to follow. Early studies in bowel preparation for procedures like colonoscopy show that mobile apps designed for patients can improve how well they prepare, reduce stress, and help them stay engaged and follow instructions more closely. In addition to using digital tools to help patients through the diagnosis process, healthcare providers are also using something called Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs). These are surveys that ask patients about their experience with medical procedures and the quality of care they received.
    By combining digital health tools with PREMs, healthcare teams can take a more patient-centred approach. This helps not only in delivering care but also in understanding what patients go through—making it easier to identify what works well and what needs improvement.

  • REC name

    South Central - Hampshire A Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    26/SC/0083

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 Mar 2026

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion