Evaluation of automated and manual cross-matching techniques 1.0
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Are automated cross-matching methods more reliable, efficient and cost effective, when compared to traditional manual methods?
IRAS ID
137218
Contact name
Stephen Hughes
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Betsi Cadwaladwr ULHB
Research summary
The study will involve using patient samples that have already been collected by clinicians as part of the patients routine care. Part of the patients samples (serum and/or blood) may be used to compare manual versus automated cross-matching methods of patient to donor compatibility.
A cross-match evolves using donor red cells and testing them against patients plasma to check for any in-vitro reactions, which would mimic the reaction that may be present within the patient.
A manual cross-match is performed when patients present with antibodies detected within their sample, this ensures compatible blood is provided.
REC name
North West - Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
13/NW/0824
Date of REC Opinion
22 Nov 2013
REC opinion
Favourable Opinion