Ethical considerations in gaining consent for airway management

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A study exploring patient attitudes to airway management under general anaesthesia and the process of consent

  • IRAS ID

    236119

  • Contact name

    Atul Kapila

  • Contact email

    atul.kapila@royalberkshire.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 6 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Modern general anaesthesia has become safer. When they arise, problems with management of the patient's airway remain at the top of the list of causes of morbidity and mortality. As the importance of informed consent has become more recognised we are interested in what matters to patients during management of their airway during general anaesthesia. Adult patients presenting for elective surgery under general anaesthesia at the Royal Berkshire Hospital will be approached, given information about the study and consent obtained. They will be asked in a face to face interview to complete a questionnaire with clinical scenarios for four situations.
    1.During routine general anaesthesia with standard airway equipment.
    2.Where difficulty with the airway is anticipated and special airway equipment and techniques will need to be used.
    3.Where a trainee anaesthetist is being supervised and learning airway management
    4.Where research on airway management, using novel equipment or techniques is being proposed.
    The results of this study will be compared to answers from a similar questionnaire answered by anaesthetists. Differences in how much and what information regarding airway management matters will be used to create written material for patients and anaesthetists that will be tested to see if it improves comprehension and communication for both groups.

  • REC name

    East of England - Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    19/EE/0178

  • Date of REC Opinion

    23 May 2019

  • REC opinion

    Unfavourable Opinion