eRAPID feasibility pilot study in pelvic radiotherapy

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    eRAPID Electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice: Feasibility pilot study in radiotherapy.

  • IRAS ID

    204978

  • Contact name

    Galina Velikova

  • Contact email

    g.velikova@leeds.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Leeds

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT02747264

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 0 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    eRAPID (electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice) is an online system for patients to self-report symptoms and side effects (known as adverse events or AE) during and after cancer treatments. eRAPID allows AE reporting from home or hospital and enables patient reported data to be integrated into existing Electronic Patient Records (EPR) to allow for the reports to be used in routine care. In addition the system is capable of generating alerts for severe AE to the relevant clinical team and providing patient advice on managing mild and moderate AE.

    We have developed the eRAPID system as a complex intervention for use in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy specifically for prostate, cervical, vulval, anal, endometrial and rectal cancers. We have done this by:
    1) Integrating QTool questionnaire data with the Christie Manchester electronic patient records system; clinical web portal (CWP) and in MOSAIQ (radiotherapy delivery system) in Leeds;
    2) Developing tumour specific AE questionnaires and treatment algorithms for online reporting from home;
    3) Mapping the current RT treatment pathways for these tumour groups via semi-structured interviews with staff and patients.

    The overall aims of the eRAPID system are to improve the safe delivery of cancer treatments, enhance patient care and standardise documentation of AE within the clinical datasets.

  • REC name

    Yorkshire & The Humber - Leeds East Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/YH/0371

  • Date of REC Opinion

    13 Sep 2016

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion