EP395-003
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the safety and tolerability of EP395 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
IRAS ID
1004396
Contact name
Dag Nesse
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
EpiEndo Pharmaceuticals
Eudract number
2021-005787-22
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Research summary
This study aims to investigate the safety and tolerability of a new medicinal product, EP395, in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). One patient group will receive EP395, the other group will receive placebo (contains no active ingredient). Neither patient nor study team will know what treatment has been allocated to the patient (blinded study). The medication is in the form of a capsule and has to be taken once daily.
Summary of Results
The findings demonstrate how informal carers navigate a path through complex cancer treatments and support their relative. A cancer diagnosis often requires multiple treatment visits to an oncology centre and this can be challenging for carers. They find that they need to co-ordinate and manage both health professionals and their care recipient(s) in terms of getting access to appropriate services and support. This process can be particularly challenging in the presence of a cognitive impairment that often demands effective communication with different agencies. Carers frequently experienced multiple challenges include dealing with the stigma and discrimination that is characteristic of the dementia experience and the added complexity of negotiating this within a cancer care context. Issues of decision-making, best interests and quality of life were also of central concern for carers. Carers within this particular context face complex challenges that are not necessarily obvious and appear under reported. Their role is often rendered invisible by the nature of the care recipients’ condition. We suggest health professionals need to respond to and support carers in different ways that do not stigmatise and hence discriminate against them.REC name
North West - Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
22/NW/0213
Date of REC Opinion
25 Aug 2022
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion