Energy cost of walking in diabetes

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    The role of lower-limb biomechanics and energy cost in walking difficulties experienced by older people with diabetes

  • IRAS ID

    127022

  • Contact name

    Milos Petrovic

  • Contact email

    m.petrovic@mmu.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Manchester Metropolitan University

  • Research summary

    People with diabetes engage in less physical activity and walk less compared to controls, which is detrimental for maintaining glycaemic control and general management of the diabetic condition. Also, self-selected walking speed is much slower and maximum walking speed substantially lower in people with diabetes. We hypothesise that altered lower-limb biomechanics and a higher energy cost for walking could be possible explanations as to why people with diabetes walk less, display slower self-selected walking speeds and appear to display ‘inefficiencies’ when walking faster. Also, the stiffening of major locomotor tendons due to diabetes will reduce their efficiency for storing and releasing elastic energy and further increase the energy cost of walking. The above hypotheses will be tested in the laboratory in diabetes patients and matched-controls (without diabetes) by firstly examining the biomechanics of walking. The external moment arm and the effective mechanical advantage around the ankle will be examined from kinetic and kinematic data. This data will then be linked with real-time imaging of the Achilles tendon to directly examine utilisation of elastic energy during walking across a range of walking speeds. The oxygen cost of walking at different speeds will be examined using an online measurement system during walking on a treadmill. The mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon will be determined to quantify any difference in stiffness caused by diabetes that may impact upon walking.

  • REC name

    North West - Greater Manchester East Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/NW/0434

  • Date of REC Opinion

    23 Jul 2013

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion