Endodontic outcomes associated with repetitive impact in boxing

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Endodontic outcomes associated with repetitive impacts to the dento-facial region during boxing activities

  • IRAS ID

    272721

  • Contact name

    Yuan-Ling Ng

  • Contact email

    y.ng@ucl.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University College London

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    Z6364106/2020/02/02, UCL Data Protection Registration

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 6 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Physical injury to teeth is a common occurrence following an accidental fall or intentional blow to the face.

    Immediate consequences of such injury include loosening, displacement, fracture or loss of teeth. If the tooth is retained, further long-term concequences include tooth nerve damage or abnormal absorption (resorption) of the tooth by the surrounding tissues. The patient may also suffer from aesthetic complications (deranged tooth arrangement, gaps or discolouration) and altered function (changed bite). Management guidelines advocate periodic clinical and x-ray examination in the first 1-5 years following the traumatic incident to reveal subtle hidden changes in the teeth and supporting tissues.

    Repetitive injury to teeth defined by frequent impact to the teeth and surrounding structures as part of contact sports, high-velocity sports or due to domestic abuse. The injuries may be of lower intensity than those described above, and thus may not warrant emergency attendance. They may nevertheless lead to long-term subclinical pathoses up to 10 years later.

    This study will use a questionnaire and a routine clinical examination to assess boxers subject to repetitive trauma for any subclinical dento-alveolar sequelae. The clinical examination will include a routine dental assessment and a routine radiographic examination.

  • REC name

    North West - Haydock Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    20/NW/0232

  • Date of REC Opinion

    12 May 2020

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion