Eliciting preferences in the arts therapies

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Eliciting preferences in the arts therapies: Focus groups to explore decision aids for the arts therapies in adult mental health services.

  • IRAS ID

    265483

  • Contact name

    Emma Windle

  • Contact email

    e.h.windle@qmul.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    QMUL

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    N/A, N/A

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 5 months, 27 days

  • Research summary

    Research Summary:
    This study aims to explore different decision aids for the arts therapies through focus groups. 6-8 participants per group will be show a leaflet about the arts therapies, four videos (one per modality) and they will take part in four short experiential taster sessions. Participants will be facilitated to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each decision aid. The groups will be video recorded, transcribed and analysed using framework analysis.

    Summary of Results:

    Four themes were developed: Previous experiences of the arts shaped discussions; Aims of treatment are essential information; There were different expectations of each decision aid; The decision aids offered an evolving understanding of the art form in the workshops.

    These results imply that service users’ previous experiences and expectations of the arts must be understood by clinicians when engaging in decision-making about treatment. Service users wanted to know explicit aims and goals of the arts therapies in all three decision aids. All decision aids were useful in different ways, therefore timing in the decision making process and physical location of the aids are worth considering.

    : https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclick.pstmrk.it%2F3ts%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%252Fscience%252Farticle%252Fabs%252Fpii%252FS0197455621000022%2FNBTI%2Fxb_1AQ%2FAQ%2Fb181e166-c15e-4027-8ad5-f454fd09eecb%2F2%2F0vES7VpJJE&data=05%7C02%7Charrow.rec%40hra.nhs.uk%7Cc7e67227d4884adf8dcd08dc83ba2e3d%7C8e1f0acad87d4f20939e36243d574267%7C0%7C0%7C638530082867734281%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0ivsFJiBYjqMBDJRP0WyretRzEllg8t%2FzS5c%2BC5D72k%3D&reserved=0

  • REC name

    London - Harrow Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    19/LO/1274

  • Date of REC Opinion

    14 Aug 2019

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion