Efficacy & safety of ofatumumab vs teriflunomide in RMS (OMB2302)

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab versus teriflunomide in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis

  • IRAS ID

    208610

  • Contact name

    Eli Silber

  • Contact email

    eli.silber@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    Novartis Pharma Services AG

  • Eudract number

    2015-005419-33

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT02792231

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 8 months, 12 days

  • Research summary

    Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system. People with relapsing MS (relapsing-remitting MS or secondary progressive MS with relapses) will have repeated attacks, or "relapses". During these relapses, a person's own immune system attacks the nerves in the brain/spinal chord and damages the myelin covering. The immune system is made up difference types of cells that work to fight infection - including B-cells and lymphocytes. Ofatumumab (the drug being investigated in this study) works by temporarily removing the number of B-cells, while teriflunomide (the drug Ofatumumab is being compared to in this study) works by limiting the increase of lymphocytes. B-cells and lymphocytes are involved in the process of inflammation that is believed to play a role in damaging the myelin and in some of the symptoms of MS.

    The main purpose of this study is to see how effective ofatumumab is in reducing relapses compared to teriflunomide. Ofatumumab is administered as an injection under the skin once every 4 weeks, whilst teriflunomide is a tablet taken orally once a day. All study participants will receive either ofatumumab or teriflunomide, as well as a matching placebo. The maximum treatment duration for any participant will be 30 months.

  • REC name

    South Central - Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/SC/0391

  • Date of REC Opinion

    11 Oct 2016

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion