Efficacy of a CBM-I tas

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A single case series investigation of the efficacy of an internet delivered multi-session cognitive bias modification - interpretation task in a clinical population with Panic Disorder.

  • IRAS ID

    124494

  • Contact name

    James Peter Hampson

  • Contact email

    j.hampson@uea.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of East Anglia

  • Research summary

    Panic disorder is a highly prevalent anxiety disorder that is associated with significant impairment across many aspects of an individual’s day to day life. Cognitive theories and information processing models of panic posit that negative biases in the interpretation of bodily sensations represent a central mechanism that helps develop and maintain symptoms of panic. Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM-I) training is a computer-text based paradigm that has proven successful in modifying interpretation biases in a benign and positive way across a number of anxiety disorders. The majority of research thus far has used analogue samples with high levels of social anxiety and generalised anxiety. The present study proposes to extend such research using a clinical sample with panic disorder (n=9) adopting a multiple baseline single-case series design. Participants with panic disorder will be randomised to length of baseline assessment period (1 - 3 weeks) and subsequently complete daily sessions of CBM-I for 1 week accessed through the internet. Measures will be repeated and follow up assessment completed. Participants will complete a semi-structured interview in order to elicit their views of accessing the CBM-I task. The data obtained from these semi-structured interview will be written up as a seperate report. It is predicted that CBM-I will modify interpretation biases to a more benign or positive level and reduce levels of panic disorder both post-treatment and at follow up.

  • REC name

    North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/NE/0171

  • Date of REC Opinion

    21 May 2013

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion