Efficacy and Safety of Seralutinib in Adult Subjects with PH‑ILD
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Inhalation of Seralutinib for the Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Interstitial Lung Disease (PH-ILD) Followed by a Long-Term Extension Evaluating Safety and Efficacy (SERANATA)
IRAS ID
1013061
Contact name
Conor O'Donovan
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
GB002, Inc.
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Research summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral inhalation of seralutinib in patients with Pulmonary Hypertension associated with Interstitial Lung Disease (PH-ILD). PH-ILD is a progressive, ultimately fatal disease that affects the daily activity and quality of life of patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of seralutinib to placebo (an inactive substance that looks like seralutinib, given the same way but has no effect on the body) on the ability to exercise when it is given to PH-ILD patients who are already taking other medications. Seralutinib was formulated to be inhaled so that it is delivered right where it is needed. This also means the amount of medication in the body is reduced. This study includes 6 week screening period, a 24 week treatment period and long term extension period of up to 144 weeks.
The study treatment is a powder that is inhaled with a dry powder inhaler device, taken twice daily.
During the study patients are asked to complete questionnaires relating to quality of life, their PH-ILD symptoms and their experience taking the study medication.
Approximately 480 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to either seralutinib 90mg, seralutinib 120mg or placebo.
The study involves procedures including physical examinations, vital signs, ECG, Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) , pulmonary function test and during screening, if required, a chest CT-scan maybe performed, as well as an echocardiogram. There are a number of sub-studies which would require participants to undertake additional procedures such as Right heart catheterization.REC name
North West - Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
26/NW/0028
Date of REC Opinion
15 Apr 2026
REC opinion
Further Information Unfavourable Opinion