Effectiveness of CAT-GSH for returning patients v0.9

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Effectiveness and acceptability of cognitive analytic therapy guided self-help (CAT-GSH) for anxiety and depression for returning patients in NHS Talking Therapies services

  • IRAS ID

    352937

  • Contact name

    Andrew J Laphan

  • Contact email

    alaphan1@sheffield.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Sheffield

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT06806176

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 1 months, 29 days

  • Research summary

    There is evidence that 14% of patients treated for their anxiety or depression in NHS Talking Therapies (TT) services return for further treatment and the needs of these patients are poorly understood and met. This project focusses on a treatment return population that have previously received cognitive behavioural therapy-guided self-help (CBT-GSH). Evidence is building for the effectiveness and acceptability of cognitive analytic therapy-guided self-help (CAT-GSH). However, no studies have examined CAT-GSH for people returning to TT services. To address this gap in the evidence base, this study will explore 1) Is CAT-GSH effective and acceptable for people returning to the Talking Therapies service, when compared to a patient who chooses CBT-GSH again, 2) Is CAT-GSH effective and acceptable for people returning to the Talking Therapies service, when compared to first-time treatment participants using CBT-GSH.

    The project does not rely on randomisation as it wishes to support patient preferences. The study will occur at 2 TT service sites, who will be trained and supervised in delivering CAT-GSH. We’ll compare CAT-GSH to CBT-GSH with the aid of propensity score matching (PSM) to create comparisons between CAT-GSH and those that choose CBT-GSH, and those that use CBT-GSH for the first time. Using PSM helps in suggesting that differences in outcomes are more likely due to the treatment itself and not other factors. The routine outcome measures that are collected in the TT services will be harvested and analysed to assess effectiveness and acceptability (dropout and attendance). Data collection will end in December 2025. The study is funded by the University of Sheffield and Catalyse Limited which is a registered charity.

    Participants will:
    • Choose their preferred GSH
    • Complete 6 sessions of either CAT-GSH or CBT-GSH
    • Sessions will be weekly or bi-weekly
    • Complete sessional outcome measures as part of routine clinical practice.

  • REC name

    East of Scotland Research Ethics Service REC 1

  • REC reference

    25/ES/0024

  • Date of REC Opinion

    21 May 2025

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion