Effect of image post-processing on interpretation, version 1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    An investigation into the immediate effect of digital mammography image post-processing on image interpretation.

  • IRAS ID

    177361

  • Contact name

    Jessica Eades

  • Contact email

    jessica.eades@btuh.nhs.uk

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 7 months, 29 days

  • Research summary

    Breast cancer remains the most common cancer among women worldwide accounting for 30% of all cancer diagnoses in the UK each year. Advances in treatment and detection have led to a continual decline in breast cancer related death rates including advances in breast imaging with digital mammography. Mammography is a continuously progressing modality and advances in technology should be utilised in order to improve breast pathology detection and interpretation. One aspect of digital mammography shown to effect interpretation is digital image post-processing and is recommended by manufacturers to improve reporting accuracy.
    A new post-processing method has recently been introduced at Basildon Hospital Breast unit producing an image of higher contrast.
    This research therefore aims to identify if image post-processing used in full-field digital mammography has an effect on breast pathology detection and interpretation.
    Women attending the one-stop symptomatic breast clinic undergoing bilateral mammography shall be involved in the study. The patient will be imaged once following which the resultant mammograms will be reported in both the original and post-processed form. The radiologist shall then complete a piloted data collection sheet for each set of images, recording the abnormalities detected and grading each based on their level of suspicion. The royal College of Radiologists Breast Group breast imaging classification system shall be used, grading the abnormalities 1-5, a technique advocated by the department of health and currently practiced at Basildon Hospital. The results of the two images shall then be compared with each other and the final results (combined imaging results and histology results if biopsy performed) to identify the most diagnostic post-processing method.
    Results from this research shall then be used to recomment future practice at Basildon Hospital Breast Unit.

  • REC name

    North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/NE/0196

  • Date of REC Opinion

    29 May 2015

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion