Effect of APT cycling on Multiple Sclerosis

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    The effect of cycling using active-passive trainers on spasticity, cardiovascular fitness, function and quality of life in people with Multiple Sclerosis.

  • IRAS ID

    200448

  • Contact name

    Lorna Paul

  • Contact email

    Lorna.Paul@gcu.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Glasgow

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT02737904

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 11 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    Exercise is beneficial for people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) however exercise options for those with moderate to high levels of disability are limited. Cycling, delivered with an Active Passive Trainer (APT) is one exercise option often offered within rehabilitation/exercise settings and many pwMS buy APT’s for home use. Anecdotally pwMS report they feel better and their spasticity reduces after APT cycling, however there is a lack of evidence to support this. \n\n30 pwMS will be recruited from the Physical Disability Rehabilitation Unit at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital and randomised to APT + usual care or usual care only. Those in the APT group will receive 30 minutes of APT (2 mins passive warm up, 26 mins active cycling and 2 mins passive cool down), five days per week for 4 weeks. Outcome measures will be cardiovascular fitness measured using the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), spasticity assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and the Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88), function assessed by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Timed 25 foot walk test (T25FW), Quality of Life measured by MSQOL-54. Outcome measures will be assessed in both groups before and after the 4 week intervention period. Symmetry, distance cycled and power will be recorded following each cycling session in the intervention group.

  • REC name

    West of Scotland REC 5

  • REC reference

    16/WS/0084

  • Date of REC Opinion

    26 Apr 2016

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion