Does intra-operative Marginprobe use reduce re-excision rates?

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Does intra-operative use of the MarginProbe device reduce the need for further re-excision procedures after conservation surgery for breast cancer?

  • IRAS ID

    161393

  • Contact name

    Faye O'Keeffe

  • Contact email

    faye.o'keeffe@manchester.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 11 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Almost 60% of all patients diagnosed with breast cancer (48000 annually in the UK) undergo breast conserving surgery (BCS. Surgical removal of the cancer aims to reduce the risk of local recurrence and patient mortality. In order to minimise the amount of tissue removed, excision up to the cancer-free area (margins) is undertaken. Further surgery, following initial breast cancer surgery, is required in 25% - 30% of patients because of disease found at the edges of the tissue removed.
    Reducing the need for further operations benefits patients (by reducing the
    number of operations required, improving cosmetic outcome and minimising anxiety) and the NHS (by realising economic benefits).
    MarginProbe, a disposable probe which measures the margins of tissue removed during breast cancer surgery, allows the surgeon to remove further tissue during the same surgical procedure to clear any involved margins, minimising subsequent re-operations. Four hundred and sixty patients in 6 specialist Breast Units will be randomly allocated after BCS (and specimen radiology), by telephone randomisation, to
    either:
    - MarginProbe assessment of the surgical specimen with re-excision of margins if required;
    - Standard BCS (clinical and radiological clear margins) whereby the wound will be closed and the surgery completed (standard UK practice).

  • REC name

    North West - Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/NW/0306

  • Date of REC Opinion

    5 Jun 2015

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion