DNA Testing to Explain Recurrent Pregnancy Loss - REPLIES Study (1.0)

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Recurrent Early Pregnancy Loss Investigation by Exome Sequencing -REPLIES Study

  • IRAS ID

    242188

  • Contact name

    Meenakshi Choudhary

  • Contact email

    meenakshi.choudhary@nuth.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 11 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    Miscarriage is the most frequent outcome of pregnancy and represents the spontaneous loss of the pregnancy before 24 weeks of gestation. Early pregnancy loss affects up to half of pregnancies with the vast majority occurring before the woman recognises the pregnancy. Up to 1 in every 20 women suffer recurrent pregnancy loss defined as more than 2 consecutive pregnancy losses leading to physical, emotional and financial consequences for couples and their families, doctors and health services.

    Different maternal conditions may trigger some pregnancy losses, however, genetic abnormalities in the embryo are the most common cause of early pregnancy loss causing up to half of the occurrences. Previous studies determined that errors in the egg formation cause the vast majority of these genetic abnormalities in embryos.

    The aim of this study is to gain insight into causes of recurrent pregnancy loss secondary to numerical chromosomal errors such as Down's syndrome using genome and whole exome DNA sequencing and to develop a cost-effective non-invasive diagnostic test that can be adopted by the NHS and incorporated into routine clinical practice.

    This is a feasibility pilot study where a small blood sample will be taken for DNA analysis from women with history of recurrent pregnancy loss with minimum one miscarriage secondary to chromosomal segregation error or abnormality such as trisomy.

  • REC name

    West Midlands - Solihull Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    18/WM/0357

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 Nov 2018

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion