Development of a preference-based outcome measure for Palliative Care

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Development of a preference-based outcome measure for use in economic evaluations of palliative care services using the Patient (palliative) care Outcome Scale (POS)

  • IRAS ID

    159556

  • Contact name

    Irene Higginson

  • Contact email

    irene.higginson@kcl.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    King's College London

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    24611, additional funder's reference number

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 10 months, 8 days

  • Research summary

    The aim of this study is to develop a method for evaluating economic aspects of the treatment and care of people with far advanced illness. There is no existing questionnaire which can tell us how patients or the public value different health states in the context of advanced illness.
    We will administer a questionnaire which asks individual participants to state how much value (in numerical terms) they attach to different health states. This questionnaire will be developed from an existing, validated patient reported tool called the POS (Patient Outcome Scale). The POS is based on what patients with advanced illness themselves prioritize as important. It is routinely used in clinical practice and in research studies, to assess changes in patients' health status but it cannot be used for economic evaluation without adaptation.

    This work is important because it provides information to policy-makers and health decision-makers which enables them to make choices about providing healthcare resources which match the priorities of patients and public. Without this work, it is not possible for the views and perspectives of patients with advanced illness, and the public, to be directly taken into account, when making value judgements about palliative care interventions / treatments .

  • REC name

    London - South East Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/LO/1774

  • Date of REC Opinion

    21 Dec 2015

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion