Crizanlizumab vs SOC in SCD patients with chronic kidney disease

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A Phase II, multicenter, randomized, open label two arm study comparing the effect of crizanilumab + standard of care alone on renal function in sickle cell disease patients ≥ 16 years with chronic kidney disease due to sickle cell nephropathy (STEADFAST)

  • IRAS ID

    269933

  • Contact name

    Rachel Kesse-adu

  • Contact email

    rachel.kesse-adu@gstt.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Novartis Pharma AG

  • Eudract number

    2018-003608-38

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT04053764

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 11 months, 26 days

  • Research summary

    Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited rare blood disorder affecting red blood cells. These cells become sickle-shaped and have difficulty passing through small blood vessels. In SCD, blood vessels are damaged and sticky due to the ongoing chronic inflammation. This may lead to blocked blood vessels (vaso-occulsion), causing acute episodes of pain and organ damage. When the blood vessels in a kidney become blocked, unblocked, and blocked again over time, this can contribute to chronic kidney disease.
    There are no prospective data demonstrating a long-term benefit of any treatment for CKD due to SCN and no treatments are approved for this indication.
    The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of new drug called crizanlizumab on renal function in SCD patients with CKD who are receiving standard of care treatment for SCD and/or CKD. Participants will be divided in two groups.
    In Group 1 participants will receive 5mg/kg dose of crizanlizumab + standard of care treatment and in Group 2 participants will receive standard of care treatment alone.
    We expect that about 10 participants in 3 different hospitals will be enrolled in this study in the UK

  • REC name

    London - Westminster Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    19/LO/1532

  • Date of REC Opinion

    4 Dec 2019

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion