Consumers views on dress code policy of carers
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Do Neckties, White Coats and Uniforms Impact on Carer-Patient Relationships and Hospital Acquired Infection Control? – What Consumers and Healthcare Providers Think
IRAS ID
161466
Contact name
Isaac Manyonda
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
St George's Hospital
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 1 months, 17 days
Research summary
The carer-patient relationship is established from the moment the carer encounters the patient. The manner in which the carer is dressed and the way in which s/he speaks contributes significantly to the patient’s first impression, and often the subsequent course of the interaction, including expectations of quality of care and confidence in the healthcare professional. It is therefore not surprising that most research to date indicates that dress code impacts on the carer-patient relationship, and as such what both the carers and the patients (consumers) think of the attire of healthcare professionals is of significant importance.
The issue of initial carer-patient salutation has been little studied. However, it is important because it helps define the nature, attitude and views of both parties. Patients do not want to have a carer that is condescending to them. Naturally they would wish to interact with someone who shows them respect, courtesy, puts them at ease and yet is highly professional and exudes confidence. When they seek medical help patients are often unwell and vulnerable, and the importance of salutation cannot be over-emphasized. In recent years, it has been suggested that certain types of attire worn by carers could increase the risk of hospital acquired infection. Despite lack of supporting evidence, the government of the United Kingdom has pronounced dress code policies, without seeking the views of consumers or healthcare professionals. We sought to examine the views on the impact of the white coat, neck-tie and uniform on carer-patient relationships and hospital acquired infection controlREC name
West Midlands - Solihull Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
15/WM/0214
Date of REC Opinion
12 Jun 2015
REC opinion
Unfavourable Opinion