Consumers’ Experiences of the Standardised Cognitive Assessment
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Consumers' Experiences of the Standardised Cognitive Assessment: A Grounded Theory Analysis
IRAS ID
277322
Contact name
Richard House
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Teesside University
Duration of Study in the UK
1 years, 1 months, 18 days
Research summary
Standardised cognitive assessments are frequently used to answer questions of clinical importance within healthcare. Specifically, such assessments result in a wealth of clinical information which are often used to guide patient care and planning; identify need and individualise treatment approaches; to determine the impact of brain injury; and support the diagnosis of intellectual disability, organic dementia, neurological conditions. However, there is evidence to suggest that the consumers of the assessment, that is, the patient, their family members and referring clinicians, often have vastly different perceptions and experiences of the assessment process. In order to maximise applicability, engagement, and usefulness of the assessment and its outcomes, there must be a more comprehensive understanding of its perceived benefit from the perspective of those participating and involved in it.
This project looks to expand on previous research through adopting a grounded theory approach to develop a theoretical understanding and subsequent model of what the consumers of the standardised cognitive assessment perceive to be helpful and meaningful from their participation in the assessment. This is important as the focus on ‘consumer satisfaction’ is growing and reflects the importance of ensuring the process and outcome of the assessment meets the needs of those involved.
Interviews of no longer than an hour will be held with patients, family members and referring clinicians from the two clinical specialties in order to determine which assessment factors are seen to be helpful and to better understand their experience of the assessment. Patients and family members are eligible should they be age 18 years and above, and accessing either Adult Neuropsychology, or Mental Health Services for Older Adults.
REC name
London - Fulham Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
20/PR/0139
Date of REC Opinion
23 Jul 2020
REC opinion
Favourable Opinion