Comparing perceived and actual knowledge in Cardiology patients

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Bridging the Knowledge Gap: Comparing perceived and actual understanding of Cardiology conditions among patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease, Heart Failure, and Valvular Heart Disease.

  • IRAS ID

    365404

  • Contact name

    Stephen Leslie

  • Contact email

    stephen.leslie@nhs.scot

  • Sponsor organisation

    Research, Development and Innovation Division, NHS Highland

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 8 months, 5 days

  • Research summary

    Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of mortality in Scotland, with rates of cardiovascular-related deaths exceeding those observed across the rest of the United Kingdom. Evidence suggests that many patients have limited understanding of the information provided regarding their diagnosis and management. Effective self-management and adherence to treatment following hospital discharge are essential to minimise the risk of readmission and prevent further deterioration of their condition.

    This study aims to assess the alignment between perceived and actual understanding that patients have of common cardiac condition among patients diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease, heart failure or valvular heart disease at a district general hospital. Participants will complete a structured survey comprising of two elements: (1) a self-assessment of their perceived knowledge and confidence in understanding their condition, associated medications and procedures and (2) objective knowledge-based questions designed to evaluate their factual understanding. Adult patients (over the age of 18 years) admitted to the district general hospital Cardiology ward with one of ischaemic heart disease, heart failure or valvular heart disease over the period of 3 months will be included. Following the collection of baseline data, we will then repeat this after the introduction of educational materials and assess for improvement in objective knowledge. We will also, with the patient's consent, follow them up in 6 months to determine the number of hospital re-admissions in that period to determine whether there is any correlation with perceived and/or actual knowledge.

    By comparing perceived and actual knowledge levels, this study intends to identify potential knowledge gaps and misconceptions in patient awareness. Findings may inform the development of targeted educational interventions to enhance patient comprehension, engagement and ultimately, clinical outcomes in our local Cardiology department.

  • REC name

    North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 1

  • REC reference

    26/NS/0021

  • Date of REC Opinion

    30 Mar 2026

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion