Community Digital INR Self-Testing Project

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Community Digital INR Self-Testing Project

  • IRAS ID

    243419

  • Contact name

    Mark Henry

  • Contact email

    Mark.Henry@wales.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Cwm Taf University Health Board

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Of the 1.2 million patients in the UK on anticoagulation therapy, fewer than 2% self-test their International Normalised Ratio (INR) level (a standardised unit describing the length of time it takes for blood to clot). Given the mounting evidence that patients who do self-test are less likely to experience a thromboembolic event, self-testing should be more common.

    The aim of this study is to develop and test an innovative model of care to improve access to patient self-testing. Not only should self-testing be more convenient for patients as they will need to attend INR Clinics less frequently, it should also maintain or improve the time their INR level is within a therapeutic range and increase local capacity to meet the demand for anticoagulation treatment.

    Patients will undergo specific training to enable them to use a blood INR self-testing device with ease. The device will connect to their smartphone (iOS or Android) via Bluetooth, and via a downloadable app, will transmit the result of the test to their local GP surgery. Here, their healthcare professional will see the result and respond accordingly via the app with the dose of anticoagulant they need to take until they are due for their next test. So long as the patient has internet access, it will not matter where they self-test.

    Data concerning the time a patient’s INR level is within therapeutic range will be collected over the course of the study and compared with the same data in the 12 months prior to the study. At the end of the study, the opinions about self-testing of both patients and healthcare professionals will be determined using focus groups and questionnaires, respectively.

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Leicester Central Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    18/EM/0207

  • Date of REC Opinion

    22 Aug 2018

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion