Co-construction of illness narratives in medical encounters

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Co-construction of illness narratives in medical encounters: a qualitative secondary data analysis of the One in a Million study.

  • IRAS ID

    232578

  • Contact name

    Sarah Nettleton

  • Contact email

    sjn2@york.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of York

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 11 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    The objective of the proposed research is to explore if and if so how illness narratives are co-constructed within consultations between doctors and patients. The study will analyse consultation recordings and verbatim transcripts of doctor patient interactions from the One-in-a-Million archive in the UK. The One-in-a-Million study comprises an archived data base of primary care medical consultations held at Bristol University (ethically approved by Central Bristol NHS REC, REF:14/SW/0112). The data collection was funded by the NIHR School for Primary Care Research (Ref: 208) to create a database of video-recorded consultations, transcripts and linked data that could be shared for future research and secondary data analysis.

    Consultations will be selected from the database on the following conditions: musculo-skeletal, psychological, digestive, cardiovascular, general and unspecified, neurological and endocrine/metabolic and nutritional - to allow for a comparison across health and illness concerns.

    Qualitative interpretive inductive thematic analysis will be used to explore these naturally occurring clinical consultations. In practice the analytic procedures will involve: observing and interpreting the archived consultations; identifying factor facilitating constructive interactions; categorising; and identifying optimum conditions for successful clinical encounters.

    This will then enable the team to identify the processes involved in the co-construction of illness narratives, which is the main aim of the study. This includes several aspects: constructing a diagnosis, etiological explanations and treatment options. Our study design is based on a sociological perspective, meaning that we seek to understand doctor-patient interactions within the wider socio-cultural contexts that permeate clinical consultations. The findings of the research will contribute to our understandings of processes of shared decision-making, satisfaction and dissatisfaction with consultations for both doctors and patients and enhance the scope for developing person-centred care.

    The proposed study is exploratory and the analysis will be used to inform research applications for funding to carrying out more detailed research.

  • REC name

    West Midlands - Coventry & Warwickshire Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    18/WM/0008

  • Date of REC Opinion

    9 Jan 2018

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion