Clinical utility of PSMA PET in prostate cancer

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    What is the clinical utility of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) ligands in patients with prostate cancer?

  • IRAS ID

    261580

  • Contact name

    Jamshed Bomanji

  • Contact email

    j.bomanji@ucl.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University College London

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    Z6364106/2020/07/134, Data Protection Registration Number

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    4 years, 11 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Imaging with radiolabeled Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emmission Tomography(PET)has been reported as a promising diagnostic tool for the assessment of patients with prostate cancer in various stages of the disease. However, the method needs further evaluation, before this modality enters mainstream and routine clinical use. This study will analyse data of patients with prostate cancer who underwent PSMA PET at the Institute of Nuclear Medicine in University College London Hospitals (UCLH)as part of clinical workup for primary staging, follow-up, recurrence or response assessment to treatment. The goals are to evaluate the efficacy of the method, compare the results with those of histopathology and standard-of-care imaging (e.g. bone scan, CT or magnetic resonance imaging), serum markers of disease (prostate specific membrane antigen) and assess the impact on clinical management choices, in order to identify the patients that are more likely to benefit from PSMA PET imaging. Secondary goals of the study include evaluation of different protocols/tracers and identification of issues that could arise from observer-related variability or potential pitfalls in image interpretation.

  • REC name

    North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    20/NE/0236

  • Date of REC Opinion

    10 Nov 2020

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion