BOSTON-2

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A Phase III, Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Demonstrate the Effectiveness and Safety of Liposomal Cyclosporine A (L-CsA) Inhalation Solution Delivered via the PARI Investigational eFlow® Device plus Standard of Care versus Standard of Care Alone in the Treatment of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Patients post Double Lung Transplantation

  • IRAS ID

    257486

  • Contact name

    Jasvir Parmar

  • Contact email

    jas.parmar@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    Zambon SpA

  • Eudract number

    2018-003205-25

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT03656926

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 8 months, 8 days

  • Research summary

    This study is designed to obtain information on the safety and the effectiveness of an investigational product called aerolized Liposomal Cyclosporine A (L-CsA) when it is given to patients to treat bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation. BOS is a long term (chronic) rejection process that can occur in the transplanted lungs.

    The study will compare 2 groups:
    Group 1: Two inhalations of nebulised L-CsA per day for 48 weeks in addition to standard of care therapy
    Group 2: Standard of care therapy for 48 weeks

    The study drug will be provided in glass vials containing 10mg L-CsA, which is to be mixed with 2.4 mL saline. The resulting solution is poured into the PARI eFlow nebuliser device for inhalation.
    The eFlow nebuliser device utilises a new technology of nebulising liquid drugs with a perforated vibrating membrane resulting in an aerosol (spray) with a high percentage of droplets in a breathable size range. The eFlow nebulizer used in the present study is a modified version of the eFlow®rapid device. It has been modified for an optimised delivery of L-CsA.

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Leicester South Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    19/EM/0250

  • Date of REC Opinion

    11 Sep 2019

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion