BOSTON-1
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A Phase III, Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Demonstrate the Effectiveness and Safety of Liposomal Cyclosporine A (L-CsA) Inhalation Solution Delivered via the PARI Investigational eFlow® Device plus Standard of Care versus Standard of Care Alone in the Treatment of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Patients post Single Lung Transplantation
IRAS ID
256929
Contact name
Jasvir Parmar
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
BREATH Therapeutics Inc.
Eudract number
2018-003204-39
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Duration of Study in the UK
1 years, 10 months, 0 days
Research summary
This study is designed to obtain information on the safety and the effectiveness of an investigational product called aerolized Liposomal Cyclosporine A (L-CsA) when it is given to patients to treat Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation. BOS is a long term (chronic) rejection process that can occur in the transplanted lung.
Cyclosporine A inhibits the immune reaction against the transplanted organ. The oral use of cyclosporine A in transplanted patients is well-established for over 20 years. It is expected that the inhaled use of liposomal cyclosporine A will be more efficient for transplanted lungs.The study will compare 2 groups:
Group 1: Two inhalations of nebulised L-CsA per day for 48 weeks in addition to standard of care therapy
Group 2: Standard of care therapy for 48 weeks
The study drug will be provided in glass vials containing 5mg L-CsA, which is to be mixed with 1.2 mL saline. The resulting solution is poured into the PARI eFlow nebuliser device for inhalation.
The eFlow nebuliser device utilises a new technology of nebulising liquid drugs with a perforated vibrating membrane resulting in an aerosol with a high percentage of droplets in a breathable size range. The eFlow nebuliser used in the present study is a modified version of the eFlow®rapid device. It has been modified for an optimised delivery of L-CsA.REC name
East of England - Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
19/EE/0236
Date of REC Opinion
1 Oct 2019
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion