BLOOM System Accuracy & User Performance BGMS

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Project BLOOM Regulatory Clinical Evaluation - System Accuracy, User Performance and System Use Evaluation for a new Blood Glucose Monitoring System.

  • IRAS ID

    196950

  • Contact name

    Laura Ritchie

  • Contact email

    lritchi6@its.jnj.com

  • Sponsor organisation

    LifeScan Scotland ltd, a J&J Company

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT02767336

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 1 months, 3 days

  • Research summary

    This is an open label, non-randomised regulatory study to evaluate user performance ,system accuracy and system use evaluation of a new blood glucose monitoring system ( BGMS).

    At least twenty male and female subjects aged 18 to 45 years who have Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus will be enrolled. These subjects will undergo in vivo glucose adjustment to achieve a stable glucose level. Once blood glucose level is within the target range, user performance and system accuracy assessments will be performed. Subjects will be monitored for up to 4 to 6 hours following the in vivo glucose adjustment procedure, after which a post-study medical will be performed before discharge from the unit.

    If required based on recruitment needs, an additional subset of a minimum of 15 male and female subjects aged 18 and over, with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus will be enrolled. These subjects will NOT take part in vivo glucose adjustment. They will come to the study unit and after informed consent and eligibility review will undergo user performance and / or system accuracy assessments based on their Glucose levels.

    The study duration for individual subjects undergoing in vivo glucose adjustment will be up to approximately 24 hours (Day -1 to post study physical). For those subjects NOT undergoing in vivo glucose adjustment study duration will be up to 2 hours

  • REC name

    West of Scotland REC 5

  • REC reference

    16/WS/0012

  • Date of REC Opinion

    4 Feb 2016

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion