BGB-290 versus Placebo in Subjects with Inoperable Gastric Cancer

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A Phase 3, Double-blind, Randomised Study of BGB-290 versus Placebo as Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Inoperable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer that Responded to Platinum-based First-line Chemotherapy.

  • IRAS ID

    239801

  • Contact name

    Nicola Turvey

  • Contact email

    nicola.turvey@parexel.com

  • Sponsor organisation

    BeiGene Ltd. c/o BeiGene USA, Inc.

  • Eudract number

    2017-003493-13

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT03427814

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 10 months, 28 days

  • Research summary

    This study is being carried out to evaluate if BGB-290 (an investigational drug) can increase the time period that the patient’s cancer responds to treatment and does not progress. Another purpose is to evaluate if the BGB-290 increases a person’s life span.

    BGB-290 is an inhibitor of PARP1 and PARP2. PARP inhibitors are a group of inhibitors of the enzyme poly ADP ribose polymerase, which are developed for the treatment of cancer. PARP inhibitors are particularly effective in tumours that have defects in DNA repair.

    Patients in this study will be assigned to either of the following 2 groups;

    ARM A; BGB-290 60mg
    ARM B; Placebo 60mg

    Patients will be randomised (assigned by chance, like flipping a coin) to either Arm A or Arm B. Neither the patient or study doctor will know which treatment they have been assigned.

    • There are up to 4 phases for participants in this study
    • Screening (to determine if participants qualify for the study)
    • Treatment (the period patients are receiving study drug treatment)
    • Safety Follow Up (a visit within 30 days after stopping study drug treatment)
    • Long Term Follow Up

    Approximately 540 patients all over the world will take part in the study. This study is being sponsored by BeiGene, Ltd.

  • REC name

    West Midlands - Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    18/WM/0122

  • Date of REC Opinion

    24 May 2018

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion