BAMES study
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Do bisphosphonates alter the skeletal response to mechanical stimulation in children with osteogenesis imperfecta?
IRAS ID
197280
Contact name
Sivagamy Sithambaram
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Sheffield Childrens NHS Foundation Trust
Duration of Study in the UK
1 years, 6 months, 1 days
Research summary
Osteogenesis Imperfecta(OI) is an inherited disorder characterised by extreme fragility of the bones. Bones often break from little or no apparent cause.
Current available medicine can increase bone strength by making bones wider and “filling in” the holes in the bone walls that weaken it. These medicines are bisphosphonates, given either by a drip intravenously (eg pamidronate), or taken by mouth (eg risedronate). Their major action is to prevent bone breakdown by stopping the normal process of removing and then replacing old bone tissue, so in some parts of the bone, new bone formation is actually reduced. Most studies of bisphosphonates in children with OI have shown increased bone mineral density and improved exercise tolerance that could positively affect new bone formation; some have shown reduced fracture rate.
Bone is highly responsive to mechanical stimulation. Whole body vibration (WBV) is a form of mechanical stimulation that has been shown to improve bone mineral density in some individuals with narrow bones.
Little is known whether bisphosphonates affect the response of the skeleton to mechanical stimulation. We will determine the response to mechanical stimulation in children with OI by looking at bone turnover markers following WBV in those who are and are not treated with bisphosphonates.
The results from this study will help us to understand whether skeleton in children with OI is normally responsive to mechanical stimulation, and whether bisphosphonates alter that responsiveness in a way that is either beneficial or not for increasing bone strength.REC name
Yorkshire & The Humber - Sheffield Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
16/YH/0095
Date of REC Opinion
6 Apr 2016
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion