Axillary plexus block - Dealing with the tourniquet

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Axillary plexus block - Dealing with the tourniquet

  • IRAS ID

    134035

  • Contact name

    Mario Cibelli

  • Contact email

    mario.cibelli@uhb.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    QEHB

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    The injection of local anaesthetic around the nerves that supply sensation from the arm can provide good and safe pain relief for most procedures on the arm. Unfortunately this technique does not provide adequate pain relief for the tourniquet, which acts as a tight band around the arm to stop blood flow and reduce the risk of bleeding during the operation. Prevention of tourniquet pain was studied in a retrospective cohort study by means of a small injection of local anaesthetic just underneath the skin into the posterior half of the arm pit. The results suggested that this injection could be used to improve patients comfort during such procedures and requires a prospective trial to be performed to confirm this.
    We propose to perform a randomised, double blinded case controlled prospective study comparing standard axillary plexus block technique to the same technique with the addition of 3-5ml of local anaesthetic injected subcutaneously in the posterior aspect of the axilla.
    We aim to show that the addition of such an injection will result in:
    • Improved patient comfort and reduced tourniquet-related pain
    • Reduced consumption of sedatives and i.v. analgesics.
    • Reduced conversion rate to general anaesthesia.
    The use of this method for the prevention of tourniquet pain is becoming widespread despite the current lack of good quality evidence.
    An audit performed in our department found that out of 96 axillary plexus blocks performed in a one month period, 92 (96%) had a subcutaneous injection in the posterior half of the axilla in addition to the normal axillary plexus block.
    We therefore hope to show that patients are not being unnecessarily exposed to an extra injection that is of no benefit to them.

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/EM/0315

  • Date of REC Opinion

    6 Oct 2015

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion