ATOM (EORTC 2022-MG)

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Adjuvant tebentafusp (IMCgp100) versus observation in HLA-A*02:01 positive patients following definitive treatment of high-risk uveal melanoma: an EORTC randomized phase III study (ATOM Trial)

  • IRAS ID

    1005922

  • Contact name

    Lore Hermans

  • Contact email

    regulatory@eortc.org

  • Sponsor organisation

    European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT06246149

  • Research summary

    This study is about a new treatment for uveal melanoma patients. Melanoma of the eye, also called uveal melanoma, is a disease that behaves differently from melanoma of the skin (a type of skin cancer).
    Despite complete removal of the cancer by surgery or radiation therapy, the risk of the melanoma coming back (a recurrence) in the future is approximately 50%. Currently, there is no scientifically proven treatment that is considered safe and that would help to reduce the risk of recurrence.
    This study will investigate whether a new immunotherapy drug called tebentafusp can reduce the risk of recurrence. Tebentafusp is an experimental medication. It helps T cells (part of the body’s immune system) stick to and attack the cancer cells. One end of tebentafusp attaches to the cancer cells, the other end turns on the T cells.
    Tebentafusp is already used to treat uveal melanoma which has spread beyond the eyes and has shown to help these patients live longer. Adult patients with uveal melanoma limited to the eye, treated with either radiotherapy or surgery, will be eligible to participate in this study. Patients included in this study are patients who would not normally receive further treatment in routine care.
    The purpose of this study is to see whether tebentafusp will improve the chance that the disease does not return. Additionally, this study aims to find out whether tebentafusp prolongs the survival of patients without the disease worsening and survival in general and, also, to evaluate the impact in terms of side effects from the drug, quality of life and circulating substances (called biomarkers) in the blood.

  • REC name

    North West - Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    24/NW/0372

  • Date of REC Opinion

    22 Jan 2025

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion