ASD traits and Gender Dysphoria mediated by cognitive rigidity.

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Does cognitive rigidity mediate the relationship between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) traits and gender-related wellbeing in adolescents?

  • IRAS ID

    270246

  • Contact name

    Anna Byrne-Smith

  • Contact email

    a.byrne-smith1282@canterbury.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Canterbury Christ Church University

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    N/A, N/A

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    There is a significant body of evidence linking gender dysphoria (GD) and autism spectrum conditions (ASC), with studies suggesting that prevalence rates of ASD among young people referred to GD clinics are up to 10 times higher than that in the general population (de Vries et al, 2010, Jones et al, 2010, Paterski et al, 2014).

    Many authors in this field have hypothesised potential factors underlying this frequent co-occurrence, including biological, social and psychological theories. One psychological theory that has been put forwards is that the cognitive rigidity that frequently occurs in autism spectrum conditions (ASC) may be a significant factor in these children presenting at gender dysphonia clinics (de Vries et al, 2010; Jacobs et al, 2014). These authors suggest that a lack of cognitive flexibility may extend to a lack of flexibility around gender, resulting in greater difficulty in managing gender variant feelings. A difficulty in managing gender variant feelings might then result in a higher likelihood of presentation at gender dyphoria clinics.

    This study aims to examine this hypothesis through the use of questionnaires designed to capture these concepts. The relationship between cognitive rigidity, gender identity and related wellbeing will be examined using 14-18 year old young people attending NHS mental health services.

  • REC name

    London - London Bridge Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    20/LO/0482

  • Date of REC Opinion

    28 Apr 2020

  • REC opinion

    Unfavourable Opinion