ASAP TOO, Version AA

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Assessment of the WATCHMAN Device in Patients Unsuitable for Oral Anticoagulation

  • IRAS ID

    222284

  • Contact name

    Tim Betts

  • Contact email

    tim.betts@ouh.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Boston Scientific International SA

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT02928497

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    6 years, 9 months, 16 days

  • Research summary

    The ASAP TOO study is designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC) Device including the post-implant medication regimen for participants with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are deemed not to be eligible for anti-coagulation therapy to reduce the risk of stroke.
    The device is intended to reduce the risk of thromboembolic ischemic stroke and systemic embolism.
    The Watchman LAA closure device is currently CE marked for those who are eligible for anticoagulation therapy, this study aims to include those who are at increased risk of stroke but are deemed by their physicians to be unsuitable for oral anticoagulation therapy.
    Up to 888 randomized participants will be enrolled in this study over 100 global investigational sites. Eligible participants will be randomized 2:1 to receive the WATCHMAN device to control (single antiplatelet therapy or no therapy).Device Group participants will undergo an implant procedure and both Device Group and Control Group participants will have follow-up visits at: 3, 6, and 12 months and then every 6 months through 60 months. Duration of the individual in the study is expected to be approximately 5 years.
    The primary effectiveness endpoint is the time to first occurrence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety endpoint is the occurrence of all-cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or device/procedure related events.

  • REC name

    London - Surrey Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/LO/0961

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 Nov 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion