anatomy guide

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Anatomy Guide for Regional Anaesthesia

  • IRAS ID

    253374

  • Contact name

    David Burckett-St.Laurent

  • Contact email

    david.burckett-stlaurent@wales.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Medaphor Limited

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 10 months, 3 days

  • Research summary

    Use of regional anaesthesia (RA) and peripheral nerve block (PNB) is growing, although general anaesthesia (GA) is still more common in general surgical practice. Around 65% of all procedures amenable to a regional technique currently use GA (Hanna , et al., 2009), and current NICE guidance is that all regional anaesthesia should be performed using ultrasound guidance (NICE, 2009). However, further increases in regional anaesthesia are expected, as there are significant patient and economic benefits (Cozowicz, Poeran, Jashvant, Zubizarreta, Mazumdar, & Memtsoudis, 2015) (Sakic, et al., 2013) (Williams, Orebaugh, & Hadzic, October 2009). In particular, the per-procedure costs of regional anaesthesia are considerably less than for general anaesthesia (Chakladar & White, 2010).

    Although growing, ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia is difficult to learn and difficult to perform (Henderson & Dolan, 2016). There are significant hand-eye-coordination issues as the clinician must simultaneously manipulate both the needle and the ultrasound probe in order to guide the needle to the target. In addition, both the needle and target anatomy can be very difficult to see on the ultrasound image.
    We believe that a computer-aided system that highlights key anatomical features on the ultrasound image would make this procedure safer for the patients and simpler for the clinician.
    The aim of this clinical investigation is to determine if machine learning can be used to automatically highlight key anatomy on the ultrasound image, and to see if it helps anaesthetists perform ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.

  • REC name

    North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    18/NE/0323

  • Date of REC Opinion

    11 Oct 2018

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion