An evaluation of MRI TIA patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    An evaluation of MRI appearances in suspected Transient Ischaemic Attack in patients with and without Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

  • IRAS ID

    212567

  • Contact name

    Laura Hall

  • Contact email

    laurahall5@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    Canterbury Christ Church University

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 8 months, 3 days

  • Research summary

    The intended aim of this study is to evaluate the imaging findings on MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) brain scans of potential stroke patients referred from a dedicated stroke clinic who also suffer from obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), a recognised risk factor for stroke, in comparison to a control group of patients without OSA attending via the same pathway. This has been finalised following a background literature search identifying a potential lack of research into this area and the author’s personal area of interest and background as a diagnostic and reporting radiographer and the particular interests of the hospital trust being utilised for this study.
    A quantitative research paradigm will be used with an empirical methodology, using an observational experimental approach. Historical MRI scan reports and images will be further analysed for potential findings. The presence and characteristics of abnormalities will be recorded and evaluated for emerging trends or correlations. This study will therefore not involve the recruitment of participants, but rather the untilisation of historical data from an NHS trust, performed for previous medical purposes.
    It is hoped that this may result in new findings regarding the relationship between obstructive sleep apnoea and stroke, which may further knowledge and understanding in this area and/or form a basis for further research.

  • REC name

    London - Surrey Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/LO/2151

  • Date of REC Opinion

    18 Jan 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion