Accuracy and feasibility of BICAMS when scored by MS Nurses

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Accuracy of Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS when scored by MS nurses and impact on MS nurses’ and MS patients’ perception of cognitive impairment.

  • IRAS ID

    312888

  • Contact name

    Hannah Potticary

  • Contact email

    hannah.potticary.2020@live.rhul.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Royal Holloway, University of London

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 8 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a lifelong condition that can affect the brain and spinal cord. More than 130,000 people in the UK have MS and it is most commonly diagnosed in people in their 20’s and 30’s. Amongst a range of symptoms, including problems with vision, balance and mood, people with MS may also experience problems with their cognition. Cognition describes mental processes such as thinking, understanding, learning, and remembering information. Cognitive impairment is recognised as a prevalent and debilitating symptom of MS and is reported to have a negative impact on quality of life (Benedict et al., 2020), activities of daily living (Gil-González et al., 2020), employment (Clemens and Langdon, 2018), relationships (Halstead et al., 2021) and symptom management (Chen et al., 2020). The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) is a short tool used to assess problems with cognition in people with MS. It can be completed with various healthcare professionals, such as nurses, however little is known about how accurate these scores are. To assess the accuracy of scores, we will compare scores of BICAMS by MS nurses with scores by a trainee clinical psychologist. We will also explore the MS nurses’ and MS patients’ experiences of completing BICAMS and how this impacts their understanding of cognition.

  • REC name

    London - London Bridge Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    22/LO/0452

  • Date of REC Opinion

    26 Aug 2022

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion