Acceptability of a first trimester screening test for pre-eclampsia

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Assessing the acceptability of a first-trimester universal prenatal screening test for pre-eclampsia - a discrete choice experiment

  • IRAS ID

    130039

  • Contact name

    James Harris

  • Contact email

    james.harris.09@ucl.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    UCL Hospital Joint Research Office

  • Research summary

    Pre-eclampsia is a serious obstetric condition that affects both mother and baby. Many tests have been devised that aim to predict if a woman is high or low risk of developing pre-eclampsia during their pregnancy. Currently there is no way of reducing the risk once it has been identified, nor of treating preeclampsia once it develops, other than expediting delivery of the fetus. An assessment of whether women and health professionals want to be given this information has not yet been taken.
    The different tests for preeclampsia that are currently available differ in various attributes, such as how accurate they are, and how invasive the test is. This study is in two parts- first, people will be asked via a focus group to rank which of the eighteen identified attributes of the tests are important for them when making a decision on whether or not to have a screening test. Once the key attributes are identified, a ‘discrete choice experiment’ will be conducted – this is a special kind of survey that asks respondents to choose between three options - two tests, that differ on the identified attributes, or a no test option. So, for example, test A may be more accurate, but test B may be less invasive.
    By making these choices, an analysis can be conducted on what, if any, screening test is most preferable to women, and so will help policy makers and care providers decide if tests should be introduced into clinical practice. Recruitment will take part in three ways – face-to-face, postal and internet.

  • REC name

    London - City & East Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/LO/0811

  • Date of REC Opinion

    5 Jun 2013

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion