A Trial of Nilvadipine in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's disease

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A European multicenre double-blind placebo controlled phase III trial of nilvadipine in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

  • IRAS ID

    119468

  • Contact name

    Robert Howard

  • Sponsor organisation

    Trinity College Dublin

  • Eudract number

    2012-002764-27

  • ISRCTN Number

    n/a

  • Research summary

    TITLE: A European Multicentre Double-Blind Placebo Controlled trial of Nilvadipine in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's disease.  DESIGN: The study employs a randomized double-blind placebo controlled parallel design.  OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of Nilvadipine as a disease course modifying treatment for mild to moderate AD in a phase III double-blind placebo-controlled study and to investigate the safety profile of Nilvadipine in patients with mild to moderate AD.  OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome measure in this study is the change from baseline to week 78 in cognitive function, as assessed by the Alzheimer’s -Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS -Cog 12). There are two key secondary outcome measures, the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-sb) and the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD).  POPULATION: A total of 500 subjects with Alzheimer's disease; 250 in the Nilvadipine group and 250 in the placebo group recruited from 31 European centres.  ELIGIBILITY: Males and females over age 50 years with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease as defined by NINCDS-ADRDA criteria.  TREATMENT: Over encapsulated Nilvadipine 8 mg, sustained release capsule, for the treatment group, taken once a day at lunchtime or, matching over encapsulated placebo for the control group, taken once a day at lunchtime.  DURATION: The total study duration will be 82 weeks. Patients will receive study medication for 78 weeks.

  • REC name

    London - Harrow Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    12/LO/1903

  • Date of REC Opinion

    4 Feb 2013

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion