Issues with our digital services

We're experiencing some issues with our digital services and are investigating why they're not working as you expect.

A study comparing PK of two inhalers in healthy volunteers (QCL117639)

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, FIVE-PERIOD CROSSOVER, SINGLE-DOSE STUDY TO COMPARE PHARMACOKINETIC PROFILES OF Z7200 MEDIUM STRENGTH AND SYMBICORT® TURBOHALER®, WITH AND WITHOUT CHARCOAL BLOCKADE, IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS.

  • IRAS ID

    189624

  • Contact name

    Isabella Salerio

  • Contact email

    isabella.salerio@zambongroup.com

  • Sponsor organisation

    Zambon Spa

  • Eudract number

    2015-003233-95

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 4 months, 28 days

  • Research summary

    The Sponsor is developing the combination study drug, Z7200, for the potential treatment of asthma and COPD.

    The study will compare the way that Z7200 medium strength is taken up by the body compared to an already licenced product, Symbicort® Turbohaler®.

    The study will consist of 10 study sequences involving up to 90 healthy male and female subjects. Each subject will participate in 5 study periods and receive either Symbicort or Z7200 both with and without activated charcoal.

    Due to high variability of the reference product a replicate dosing design will be employed such that each subject will be dosed with the Symbicort Turbohaler in the absence of charcoal on two occasions. A previous clinical study comparing Z7200 and Symbicort Turbohaler failed to show the products were comparable; part of the reason for this was assigned to the fact the Symbicort Turbohaler used was from a single batch. The high variability of Symbicort Turbohaler has been published therefore, for the current study, the Symbicort Turbohaler will be sourced from multiple batches in order to account for the high variability of the reference product.

  • REC name

    Wales REC 2

  • REC reference

    15/WA/0372

  • Date of REC Opinion

    14 Dec 2015

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion