A Patient Information Leaflet and Non specific Abdominal Pain

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Evaluation of the impact of a patient information leaflet and adequacy of staff explanations of the diagnosis of non-specific abdominal pain in an acute hospital population

  • IRAS ID

    188320

  • Contact name

    Cathy Price

  • Contact email

    c.m.price@soton.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Southampton

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 2 months, 7 days

  • Research summary

    Non specific Abdominal pain is very common in the adult population. It refers to abdominal pain where there is no
    specific diagnosis and accounts for nearly half of all surgical admissions with abdominal pain. However patients come
    into hospital expecting an explanation for their pain yet often pain turns out to be non specific. If the pain is severe and
    persistent then this in itself may be upsetting as they may feel disbelieved without a specific diagnostic label.
    Explaining to patients what is actually going on may therefore be a challenge. An effective doctorpatient
    relationship
    is necessary and staff need to be confident in providing explanations and where to seek help. Some may require
    simple explanations and reassurance only, others may require in depth assessment and expert input from other
    specialties. Such advice is often in scarce supply and indeed may not be necessary if better systems are in place to
    provide adequate explanations and advice backed up by guidance as to how to seek help if problems persist.
    To improve patient care a rolling staff development programme is planned. A leaflet has been developed for patients
    with patient input and piloted by pain clinic staff.
    This study aims to evaluate the current effectiveness of staff explanations and the usefulness of an additional current
    patient information leaflet through seeking end user views on the usefulness of both staff explanations and written
    information.

  • REC name

    London - Harrow Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/LO/1948

  • Date of REC Opinion

    9 Nov 2015

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion